PETROLEUM GEOLOGY OF JAMAICA
AN OVERVIEW
by Kirton Rodrigues Ph.D.
INTRODUCTION
Four dry holes were drilled in Jamaican territory between 1981 and 1983. These results, combined with the seven
dry holes recorded between 1955 and 1973, would suggest that conditions did not favour the generation, accumulation
and preservation of petroleum in Jamaica. Most of these wells penetrated thick sections of Cretaceous and Early
Tertiary sediments but no significant shows were encountered.
The occurrence of hydrocarbons in commercial quantities depends on a combination of several factors essential for
petroleum generation and accumulation. Organic-rich beds must be able to generate oil and gas as a result of thermal
maturation during a time span in the evolution of the basin when migration of hydrocarbons into traps is feasible
without escape to the surface. Permeable conduit beds capable of gathering hydrocarbons generated must be favourably
placed in space and time and the migrating hydrocarbons must be contained in porous reservoir beds confined within
some trapping configuration by impermeable sealing beds. The tectonic history of the basin subsequent to petroleum
accumulation in reservoirs must be favourable to the preservation of these petroleum-filled structures.
An evaluation of the petroleum potential of Jamaica in terms of generation, accumulation and preservation efficiencies
is attempted here.
GENERAL GEOLOGY
Tertiary limestones cover more than 70% of the surface geology of Jamaica. Pre-Tertiary rocks are exposed in Cretaceous
'inliers' scattered over the island
dated sedimentary rocks are Albian limestones and a Late Cretaceous to Recent stratigraphic succession is exposed
on the island. Metamorphic rocks of greenschist and amphibolite facies derived from greywackes and volcanogenic
sediments are probably Cretaceous in age.
Most of the Early Cretaceous (Valanginian to Aptian) comprises rudist-bearing limestones, lava flows and volcaniclastic
conglomerates, sandstones and shales. The Campanian to Maastrichtian of western Jamaica is represented by interbedded
sandstones and shales more than 2000m thick, with minor conglomerates and thin limestones. Lava flows, volcaniclastics
and limestones of equivalent age are present in central and eastern Jamaica.
Tertiary stratigraphy is marked by a gradual upward transition from clastic to carbonate sedimentation. Paleocene
to Early Eocene sections over Jamaica are characterised by clastic sedimentation. A reduction in clastic input
gave rise to the impure Yellow Limestone Group of Early - Middle Eocene which grades upwards into the pure cherty
micrites and sparites of the White Limestone Group (Middle Eocene - Middle Miocene).
PETROLEUM GENERATION
Shales with low organic carbon contents (<0.5% TOC) are found in the Hanover and Sunderland Newman Hall Formations
and the Veniella shales of western Jamaica (Fig. 1 and Table I) and in the Richmond and Cross Pass Formations
of eastern Jamaica. Marginal organic carbon contents (0.5 - 1.0 % TOC) are indicated for some sections of the
Windsor Formation and for parts of the Richmond Formation. Shales with good source rock quality (>1.0% TOC)
are confined almost exclusively to the Chapelton Formation cored in the Content well. This Formation is very rich
in parts and given the appropriate organic matter types even a thin sequence may be capable of generating significant
quantities of hydrocarbons.
Only the Chapelton Formation in the MontpelierNewmarket belt has sufficient concentrations of oil-prone organic
matter capable of generating commercial quantities of liquid hydrocarbons. Organic matter types in all other Formations
analysed (Table I) are predominantly humic (gas-prone) and reworked (inert) and their low organic matter contents
would be incapable of supporting significant gas generation.
Hanover, western Clarendon and Blue Mountain blocks (Fig. I) have been buried to depths greater than 2 km while
in the Montpelier-Newmarket and Wagwater belts Tertiary overburden may have been 3-4 km thick. Cretaceous shales
generally display vitrinite reflectances greater than 0.6% suggesting that these sequences were buried deep enough
for a sufficiently long time for oil generating maturity to be attained. The lower sections of some Cretaceous
Formations may have advanced to gas generating maturity.
Tertiary sections analysed (Table 1) have never been buried beyond 2-3 km and are generally immature with respect
to petroleum generation. Indeed the only Formation with positive indicators of petroleum source rock quality (Chapelton
Formation) has not experienced a thermal history compatible with peak oil generation in the area sampled. Higher
maturity levels may be attained where the section is more deeply buried to the south (Fig. 1).
PETROLEUM ACCUMULATION
Most of the sedimentary sections in Jamaica consist of interbedded shales, mudstones and sandstones with some conglomeratic
horizons (Plate 1). If hydrocarbons were generated in these shales the most probable reservoirs would be the interbedded
sandstones and conglomerates. Detrital grains in many of these sandstones are angular to subangular and sorting
is generally poor. Short transport distances and rapid deposition of these sandstones are implied by their poor
sorting, angular clastic grains and abundance of unstable lithic fragments and feldspars. Petrographic analyses
indicate that the sandstones are litharenites and feldspathic litharenites. Volcanic rock fragments comprise more
than 50% of the total detrital grains with feldspars second most common constituent (10-43%).
· Quartz content ranges from 1 to 32% and averages 12%.
Clastic sediments associated with arc-derived detritus are typically low in quartz but high in plagioclase feldspar
and volcanic lithic fragments. The mean framework modes calculated for these sandstones plot within or close to
the magmatic arc provenance of Dickinson and Suczek (1979) on the Q-F-L diagram.
The magmatic are provenance suggested for these sandstones is compatible with Cretaceous and early Tertiary paleogeography
in Jamaica. Cretaceous volcanic centers existed on the Clarendon block in central Jamaica and on the Blue Mountain
block to the east. These volcanic piles, situated topographically as paleohighs, would have supplied source material
to gravity flows which fed peripheral sedimentary basins with detrital sediments. High relief of the source areas
associated with differential tectonic activity resulted in rapid erosion. Modification of the unstable mineralogical
suite (consisting predominantly of feldspars and volcanic lithic fragments) was not possible over the short transport
distances involved and mineralogically immature, poorly sorted sandstones were deposited. Thus at the site of deposition
porosity and permeability were already low due to poor sorting. Alteration of unstable mineralogy with depth and
associated diagenesis resulted in a further reduction of the effective porosity and permeability in these sandstones
by producing a recurrent sequence of authigenic cements.
Carbonates appear to have some potential as reservoir rocks in Jamaica. Good porosity and permeability were reported
in the Guinea Corn Limestone found in the Cockpit well (Clarendon block). A dolomitised rudist limestone in the
Negril Spots well (Negril Savanna La Mar belt) had porosity values ranging up to 20%. Four carbonate units encountered
in the Negril Spots well all showed porosity from dolomitisation and the development of caverns and vugs with interconnecting
fractures.
Structural traps may be present over Jamaica and several large anticlines have been mapped at the surface. Indeed
most of the prospects mapped to date have been anticlines, defined either from surface mapping or from subsurface
seismic profiles. Anticlinal structures in Jamaica were formed either as a result of tectonic stresses or reflect
compaction on basement rocks or paleohighs. Stratigraphic traps may be created where Upper Cretaceous and Early
Tertiary sediments wedge out against these structures. However lack of adequate subsurface control at present makes
it difficult to locate these stratigraphic traps at depth.
Structural relationships between the Cretaceous and Tertiary are generally obscure and the structure of the Yellow
Limestone Group and younger rocks is often discordant upon the Cretaceous structure. Problems arise in exploring
for structural traps as the presence of an anticline in Tertiary rocks at the surface does not necessarily reflect
a similar structure at depth.
Impermeable shale, mudstone and siltstone beds which may act as adequate cap rocks for sealing traps are present
in Cretaceous and Early Tertiary sections of Jamaica. These beds are fairly extensive horizontally, often occurring
interbedded with sandstones, and may serve as both source and seal. However most of these impermeable beds appear
too indurated and competent and may fracture rather than fold if subjected to tectonic stress.
PETROLEUM PRESERVATION
Jamaica is located in a zone of intense tectonic activity and has had an active tectonic history, particularly
since the Middle Miocene. Major faults have prominent surface expressions (Fig. 1) and would have provided avenues
of escape for petroleum that may have been trapped at depth. In addition, some prospective Cretaceous sections
which have been uplifted are now exposed at the surface and large sections have been destroyed at the present erosion
level. Whatever hydrocarbons that may have been generated and stored in these Formations would have been lost to
the surface.
Granodiorite intrusions, the large number of faults and the present deep erosion level would have combined to destroy
any hydrocarbons that accumulated in the
High geothermal gradients prevailing in the active marginal basin of the Wagwater belt in the early Tertiary would
have also destroyed any petroleum generated in the area, except in the shallow parts, most of which have been removed
by erosion. Thus large sections of eastern Jamaica are non-prospective.
The Tertiary carbonate cover has been extensively fractured and faulted and these faults probably extend downward
to the Cretaceous. Seals would have been breached, thus permitting escape of hydrocarbons. One exception is the
Montpelier-Newmarket belt where the relatively simple tectonic history and structural pattern would have favoured
preservation of any accumulated hydrocarbons.
The existence of oil and gas seeps in an area is a sure indication that petroleum has been generated. The Windsor
gas seep at St. Ann's Bay in the North Coast belt is the only significant surface indication of hydrocarbons identified
in Jamaica and would rank as a relatively small seep by international standards. The gas appears to be biogenic
in origin. Although the absence of hydrocarbon seeps does not preclude the existence of adequate source and reservoir
rocks in the subsurface the lack of surface indications of oil and gas in Jamaica is certainly a negative factor,
considering the numerous faults extending at depth and the fact that many Cretaceous sections have been uplifted
and their sedimentary cover removed.
CONCLUSIONS
A review of the petroleum geology of Jamaica would suggest that conditions for the generation, accumulation and
preservation of commercial deposits of petroleum were not ideal. Perhaps the most obvious negative factors are
the apparent lack of adequate reservoirs and the relatively active tectonic history, particularly since the Middle
Miocene.
The Chapelton Formation in the Content well has the best potential as source rocks for petroleum generation. Reservoir
quality in the area is unknown and sandstones of the Masemure Formation underlying the Chapelton Formation in the
cored section of the Content well were generally tight and well cemented. The availability of seals and structures
in the southern Montpelier-Newmarket belt remains uncertain. Additional exploration may be justified subject to
the identification of adequate reservoirs and structures which are in reasonably close proximity to potential source
rocks.
REFERENCES CITED
Dickinson, W.R. and Suczek, C. A., 1979, Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions : Amer, Assoc. Petrol. Geol.
Bull., v.63, p.2164 -2182.
Eva, A. N., 1980, Petroleum potential of Jamaica A case study of part of an ancient island arc UN ESCAP CCOP/SOPAC
Tech. Bull., v.3, p.143-151.
Table 1:
Formations analysed, shown in relation to age and geologic province.
Figure 1 Structural suhdivision of Jamaica into morpho tectonic units (modified after Eva, 1980). Major faults
with surface expression indicated.
PIase 1: Interbedded shales, siltstones and sandstones in the Richmond Fomation of eastern Jamaica. Front Cover)


DRILLING & PRODUCTION DATA
JANUARY - MARCH 1984
| COMPANY |
| DEVELOPMENT |
| NO. OF WELLS |
TOTAL FOOTAGE |
|
|
| EXPLORATION |
| NO. OF WELLS |
TOTAL FOOTAGE |
|
|
AVERAGE BOPD |
| AMOCO |
|
|
239,270
|
| MOBIL |
|
|
|
| DEMINEX-AGIP |
|
|
|
| P.C.O.L. |
|
|
1,023
|
| TENNECO-OCCIDENTAL |
|
|
|
| TEXACO |
|
|
30,277
|
| TRINMAR |
|
|
115,998
|
| TRINTOC |
|
|
27,001
|
| TRINIDAD TESORO |
|
|
65,296
|
| TOTAL |
|
|
478,865
|
Home |
About Us |
Links To The
World | Publications | Upcoming Events |
FAQ's|
Library
Oil & Gas |
GSTT
Store |
Geology of T&T |Teaching Resources|
Virtual Field Trip|
Careers
Comments or Questions?